Get Online in 72 Hours
Professional one-page website for just £479
Not every web design trend deserves your attention. Learn which trends improve user experience and business outcomes, and which ones to skip.
Every year brings a fresh wave of web design trends. Brutalism. Glassmorphism. 3D illustrations. Parallax everything.
Most of them disappear within months. A few stick around because they actually solve real problems.
The difference between a passing fad and a genuinely useful trend comes down to one question: does this improve the user experience or business outcomes?
If it doesn’t, it’s decoration. And decoration ages poorly.
Here’s how to separate the trends worth adopting from the ones you should ignore.
Design trends often emerge from two places: designer portfolios and tech demos.
Portfolio sites chase novelty. They exist to impress other designers, not to convert visitors or communicate clearly. What works on a creative agency’s experimental homepage rarely works for a local business trying to book clients.
Tech demos showcase what’s technically possible, not what’s practically useful. Just because you can build a website with full-screen video backgrounds and scroll-triggered 3D animations doesn’t mean you should.
Following trends blindly creates several problems:
Performance suffers. Heavy animations, complex layouts and experimental effects slow down your site. Slower sites convert less and rank worse in search.
Usability decreases. Unconventional navigation, hidden menus and overly creative layouts confuse visitors. Confused visitors leave.
Your site ages quickly. Trendy design looks dated within a year. Timeless, functional design remains effective indefinitely.
Development costs increase. Custom animations, experimental layouts and cutting-edge techniques take longer to build and maintain.
The goal isn’t to look trendy. The goal is to communicate clearly, load quickly and convert visitors efficiently.
Some trends help with that. Most don’t.
Speed isn’t a trend, it’s a requirement. But the increasing emphasis on Core Web Vitals and measurable performance standards is shifting how sites are built.
Google’s Core Web Vitals measure three things:
These metrics directly impact search rankings and user experience.
Fast sites convert better. Research consistently shows that even small improvements in load time can significantly increase conversions and reduce bounce rates.
Fast sites rank better. Google explicitly uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking factor. Slow sites get penalised.
Fast sites cost less. Efficient code uses fewer server resources and consumes less bandwidth, reducing hosting costs.
Choose lightweight tools. Static site generators like Astro deliver faster performance than WordPress or heavy JavaScript frameworks.
Optimise images. Use modern formats like .avif or .webp, compress aggressively, and lazy-load images below the fold.
Minimise JavaScript. Every script adds weight and processing time. Question whether you actually need each plugin, library or tracking tool.
Use efficient hosting. Modern platforms like Cloudflare Pages deliver content from edge locations near your users, reducing latency.
This isn’t a trend that’ll fade. Performance standards will only get stricter. Building fast from the start is cheaper than retrofitting speed later.
Mobile-first design isn’t new, but many sites still treat mobile as an afterthought. The shift toward truly mobile-first thinking is worth embracing.
Over 60% of web traffic comes from mobile devices. For local businesses, that number is often higher. People search for plumbers, electricians and tradespeople from their phones while dealing with an immediate problem.
If your site doesn’t work perfectly on mobile, you’re losing the majority of potential customers.
Mobile users have different needs. They want phone numbers they can tap to call immediately. They want addresses they can tap to get directions. They want quick answers without scrolling through desktop-optimised layouts.
Google uses mobile-first indexing. Google ranks your site based on how it performs on mobile, not desktop. A poor mobile experience hurts your search visibility.
Mobile conversion rates are rising. As mobile experiences improve, more users are comfortable booking, purchasing or enquiring from their phones.
Design for mobile screens first. Start with the smallest screen size and add complexity for larger devices, not the other way around.
Make tap targets large. Buttons and links should be easy to tap accurately with a thumb. Too small and users get frustrated.
Simplify navigation. Complex multi-level menus don’t work on small screens. Keep navigation clear and minimal.
Test on real devices. Simulators are useful, but nothing replaces testing on actual phones to catch usability issues.
Mobile-first isn’t optional anymore. It’s the baseline expectation.
Accessibility is finally becoming a priority, not an afterthought. This trend improves usability for everyone, not just users with disabilities.
Accessible sites work better for everyone. Clear headings, good colour contrast, logical tab order and descriptive links make sites easier to use regardless of ability.
Accessibility is legally required in many cases. UK businesses can face legal action for inaccessible websites under the Equality Act 2010.
Accessible sites perform better in search. Proper heading structure, descriptive alt text and semantic HTML help search engines understand your content.
You’re excluding potential customers without it. Around 20% of the UK population has some form of disability. Inaccessible sites turn away paying customers.
Use semantic HTML. Proper heading tags (h1, h2, h3), lists, buttons and links help screen readers navigate your site.
Ensure colour contrast. Text must be readable against its background. WCAG standards provide minimum contrast ratios.
Add descriptive alt text to images. Screen readers rely on alt text to describe images. Make it useful, not generic.
Make forms keyboard-navigable. Users should be able to complete forms without a mouse.
Test with accessibility tools. Tools like WAVE or axe DevTools catch common issues.
Accessibility isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s a fundamental part of good design.
Micro-interactions are small, purposeful animations that provide feedback to user actions. A button changing colour on hover. A form field highlighting when focused. A success message appearing after submission.
When done well, they make sites feel responsive and polished without adding visual clutter.
They provide immediate feedback. Users know their action registered. Click a button and it responds. Submit a form and you see confirmation. This reduces uncertainty and improves perceived responsiveness.
They guide attention. Subtle animations can draw attention to important elements without being distracting.
They enhance usability. Highlighting the active form field or showing password requirements as you type helps users complete tasks more easily.
Keep it subtle. Micro-interactions should be barely noticeable. If they draw attention away from content, they’re too much.
Use them purposefully. Every animation should serve a functional purpose: confirm an action, provide feedback, guide attention.
Prioritise performance. Use CSS animations over JavaScript where possible. Animate transform and opacity properties, not width, height or position.
Test on lower-end devices. Animations that feel smooth on a high-end laptop might stutter on an older phone.
Micro-interactions done right make sites feel professional and responsive. Done wrong, they’re distracting and slow.
Tiny fonts are out. Clear, generous typography is in.
This trend improves readability across devices and reduces eye strain, making content easier to consume.
Readability directly impacts engagement. Visitors can’t act on content they struggle to read. Larger type with proper spacing makes information easier to process.
Mobile screens demand it. Small fonts are even harder to read on small screens. Increasing base font sizes improves mobile usability.
It looks confident. Large, clear type conveys authority and purpose. Cramped, tiny text looks cluttered and uncertain.
Start with 16px minimum for body text. This is the browser default for good reason. Smaller text is harder to read, especially on mobile.
Use larger headings. Clear visual hierarchy helps visitors scan your content quickly.
Increase line height. More space between lines improves readability. Aim for 1.5 to 1.75 line height for body text.
Limit line length. Long lines are hard to read. Keep body text to around 60-75 characters per line.
Typography isn’t flashy, but it’s one of the most impactful design decisions you can make.
Complex mega-menus and multi-level navigation are being replaced by simpler, clearer approaches.
Simpler navigation reduces decision fatigue. Too many options overwhelm visitors. Clear, minimal navigation helps them find what they need quickly.
It works better on mobile. Complex menus don’t translate well to small screens. Simple navigation adapts easily.
It forces prioritisation. When you can’t fit 20 links in your navigation, you have to choose what actually matters. That clarity benefits users.
Limit top-level navigation items. Five to seven items maximum. Any more and you’re overwhelming visitors.
Use clear, descriptive labels. “Services” beats “What We Do”. “Contact” beats “Get in Touch”. Be direct.
Make it obvious. Don’t hide navigation behind unconventional icons or vague labels.
For many small businesses, especially those with one-page sites, navigation can be as simple as anchor links to different sections. No complex structure needed.
White space (or negative space) isn’t empty space. It’s breathing room that makes content easier to process and more visually appealing.
It improves readability. Content surrounded by space is easier to focus on than content crammed into every available pixel.
It creates visual hierarchy. Spacing around important elements draws attention without needing bright colours or heavy borders.
It looks professional. Generous spacing conveys confidence and intentionality. Cramped layouts look amateurish.
Don’t fill every pixel. Resist the urge to cram more content into your layout. Space is valuable.
Increase padding and margins. Give elements room to breathe. Sections shouldn’t feel squashed together.
Use it to group related content. Items close together feel related. Items with space between them feel separate.
White space isn’t wasted space. It’s one of the most effective design tools available.
Some trends can work in specific contexts but often cause more problems than they solve.
The case for it: Users increasingly expect dark mode options, especially on content-heavy sites or apps used at night.
The case against it: Implementing proper dark mode doubles your design and testing work. Colours, contrast and readability all need reconsideration.
When to use it: If your audience will genuinely benefit (long reading sessions, frequent return users) and you have the resources to implement it properly.
When to skip it: For simple business sites with short visits. The effort rarely justifies the benefit.
The case for it: Animations triggered as users scroll can make long pages more engaging and guide attention.
The case against it: They add complexity, slow performance, and can feel gimmicky. They’re also harder to implement accessibly.
When to use it: Sparingly, for specific storytelling needs on portfolio or campaign pages.
When to skip it: On business sites focused on conversion. Simple, fast and clear beats animated and slow.
The case for it: Grid-based layouts can present multiple pieces of information in a visually organised way.
The case against it: They often sacrifice hierarchy for aesthetics. Visitors don’t know where to look first.
When to use it: For showcasing portfolio work or case studies where everything has equal weight.
When to skip it: For homepages or landing pages where you need to guide visitors toward one primary action.
Some trends actively harm usability and performance. Avoid them.
Full-screen video backgrounds look impressive in demos. In practice, they’re a performance disaster.
Why to avoid them:
If you need video, embed it purposefully where it serves the content. Don’t make it decorative wallpaper.
Parallax effects (where background elements move slower than foreground elements) were everywhere a few years ago. They’re fading for good reason.
Why to avoid them:
Simple scroll behaviour performs better and works for everyone.
Auto-playing videos, carousels or animations frustrate users and harm accessibility.
Why to avoid them:
Give users control. Let them choose to play videos or advance through content.
We don’t chase trends. We adopt techniques that improve user experience and business outcomes.
Our approach is simple:
Performance comes first. If a trend slows down the site, it’s out. Fast sites convert better and rank better.
Function over decoration. Every design decision must serve a purpose: improve clarity, guide action, build trust. Visual novelty for its own sake doesn’t make the cut.
Test with real users. What works in a design portfolio doesn’t always work in the real world. We prioritise usability over aesthetics.
Build for longevity. Trendy sites look dated quickly. Timeless, functional design remains effective for years.
This means we embrace trends like mobile-first design, accessibility, performance optimisation and clear typography because they make sites work better.
It also means we skip video backgrounds, heavy animations and experimental layouts because they sacrifice usability for visual novelty.
Not sure whether a trend is worth adopting? Ask these questions:
Will this make the site easier to use? If a trend complicates navigation, slows performance or confuses visitors, skip it.
Does it solve a real problem? If you’re adding something purely because it looks interesting, that’s decoration, not design.
Will this help convert visitors? The goal of your site is to turn visitors into customers. Does this trend support that goal or distract from it?
Will this improve search rankings? Performance, accessibility and mobile usability all impact SEO. Does this trend help or hurt?
Can it be implemented efficiently? Complex trends often require heavy JavaScript, third-party libraries or ongoing maintenance. Is the benefit worth the cost?
Does it work on all devices? Trends that only work well on high-end devices exclude large portions of your audience.
Will this look dated in 12 months? Highly stylised trends age quickly. Functional, minimal design remains effective indefinitely.
Will it require frequent updates? Trends that rely on specific technologies or frameworks can become technical debt.
If a trend passes these tests, consider it. If it doesn’t, ignore it.
Trends come and go. These principles don’t:
Clarity beats cleverness. Visitors should understand what you do and how to contact you within seconds. Clever design that confuses people fails.
Fast beats fancy. A simple site that loads instantly converts better than a beautiful site that takes 5 seconds to appear.
Simple beats complex. Most small businesses don’t need multi-page sites with complex navigation. One clear page often outperforms elaborate structures.
Mobile beats desktop. More people will view your site on phones than computers. Optimise accordingly.
Accessible beats exclusive. Sites that work for everyone are better sites.
These principles are boring. They’re also the foundation of every high-performing website we’ve built.
Web design trends aren’t inherently good or bad. They’re tools.
The question isn’t “Is this trending?” It’s “Does this improve the user experience and support business goals?”
Performance optimisation, mobile-first design, accessibility, clear typography and purposeful simplicity all pass that test. They make sites work better for real users with real goals.
Video backgrounds, parallax effects, auto-playing carousels and overly complex animations fail that test. They prioritise novelty over usability.
The best websites don’t chase trends. They focus on clarity, speed and conversion.
That’s what we build at Mapletree Studio. No gimmicks. No unnecessary complexity. Just fast, focused sites that work.
If you’re tired of trend-chasing and want a website that prioritises performance and results over visual novelty, our Launch Package delivers exactly that. Clean, minimal design built on modern tech that loads fast and converts visitors.
No bloat. No fads. Just sites that work.
Ready for a website that focuses on results instead of trends? Let’s build something that lasts.
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Mapletree Studio specialises in minimal, high-performance websites that convert. Based in the Midlands, serving businesses across the UK.
Discover what makes minimal websites truly effective. Real examples from brands that prove less is more when it comes to design and conversions.
Templates promise quick websites but deliver bloated code, cookie-cutter designs, and poor performance. Here's why custom-built beats off-the-shelf every time.
Map the complete user journey from first click to paying client. Understand conversion stages, remove friction points, and optimise every step.